|
SLOWING CORPORATE EARNINGS CREATE NORMAL SHORT-TERM
STOCK MARKET VOLATILITY
Author:
Norman C. Leon, Investment Analyst
January 1, 2008
In mid-November, the U.S. stock market witnessed its first
10% correction since March 2003, as investors reassessed the growth
potential of corporate profits for the rest of 2007 and 2008. A market
correction is defined when a broad stock market index, such as the Dow Jones
Industrials Average or the S&P 500 Index, declines 10-19% from its last high
point. A bear market occurs when the stock market declines 20% or more from
the index’s last high point. For perspective, such market events are
infrequent compared to rising market or bull market (+20%) periods. But
their occurrence, while short-lived compared to bull markets, come across to
investors as being more acute and intense than rising markets and bull
market periods.
For perspective, (stock) market corrections and bear markets
can result when expectations and the ensuing reality of corporate profit
growth slows or even declines. In this particular period, the cause for the
(stock) market’s correction stems primarily from what was a period of loose
credit standards from 2003-2006 that fueled a housing market boom…and
tragically, a subsequent housing asset-price bubble. When the Federal
Reserve slowly raised short-term rates from 2004 through 2006 to stave off
the effects of growing inflation concerns, this commensurately raised bank
lending rates and tightened their credit lending standards.
With rising mortgage defaults, escalating foreclosure rates,
and some financial institutions having to take back homes, financial
institutions have taken enormous write-downs on soured subprime mortgages.
This was so extensive in the financial sector it had the effect of lowering
3rd quarter S&P 500 Index corporate profit growth from an
estimate of 2.4% earnings growth to an actual -9.5% earnings decline!
Incidentally, if you excluded the earnings decline of financial services,
operating earnings for the 3rd quarter actually grew 1.6% over
the previous year. So, the brunt of this came from slow to declining
financial company earnings and select consumer discretionary companies.
Weaker corporate profits ultimately translate into
lower stock prices, which could further erode the confidence of consumers
who are already feeling less wealthy as fuel costs rise and home values
recede. In the first two quarters of 2007, S&P 500 companies operating
earnings rose at high-single digit growth rates from a year earlier, before
dropping into negative territory in the third quarter. For perspective,
this recent profit weakness has followed a remarkable corporate profit run,
because from mid-2002 to 3rd quarter 2006 corporate earnings had
been growing at double-digit rates for 18 consecutive quarters!
Despite the fall off in earnings growth from financial institutions and
select consumer discretionary companies, most of Corporate America’s other
economic sectors have guided Wall Street to better earnings prospects in the
past three months. There is understandable concern that tightening bank
lending standards, a continuing housing market slowdown, and rising energy
prices could infect other sectors of the economy, thus the escalated
(stock) market volatility in 2007. It’s important to note while the S&P 500
corporate earnings declined for the 3rd quarter and expected to
decline in the 4th quarter, most of the downward earnings
revisions have come from companies in the Financial and Consumer
Discretionary sector. Retailers, home builders, banks and brokerage firms
have suffered as bad loan concerns and an outlook for tighter lending
standards may crimp earnings growth for these companies.
As short-term investors grapple in this period with
corporate profit expectations, and how consumer- spending will positively or
negatively impact those expectations vs. reality, (stock) market volatility
has understandably escalated in the second half of 2007.
Figure 1 A Volatile
(Stock) Market in 2007

As you
see in Figure 1, the broad-industry of companies in the S&P 500 Index
have undergone sharp up and down movements as investors wrestle with the
outlook for corporate earnings for the rest of 2007 and 2008.
Through 2007, the S&P 500 Index has earned
a total return of 5.5%. But from peak to trough we’ve
had declines of -5.9% in March, -9.7% in August, and -10.1% in
November. While commensurately witnessing trough-to-peak rises of 13.2%
in July, 11.4% in October, and 8.0% in December,
we come out of 2007 with a 5.5% total return.
While near-term (stock) market returns
will remain volatile as the housing market resolves itself and consumers and
investors adjust to it, no one truly knows how long this heightened market
volatility will last. But as historical backdrop, since 1950 the Dow Jones
Industrials Average has seen 18 market corrections (declines of 10% to
19.9%), within a bull market period. There have been 10 bear markets, or
declines of 20% or more. The average time for the Dow to recover from a
bear market was about three years from the low point. When it was a (stock)
market correction, the market recovered and climbed above its previous peak
on average within six months. Only two (stock) market corrections since
1950 have needed more than a year to recover, and even then the Dow was back
to its former high within two years. And if the corrections and bear
markets are taken together, the average recovery time is just a year and
four months – good news for retirement investors who have a much longer
investment horizon.
So as short-term fears over credit
lending matters and the housing market’s correction continue, given you are
retirement investors and (by default) are long-term investors, such matters
should be discounted. In other words, short-term market events are not
in-line with your long-term investment focus.
With Freedom One’s MAPs,
you’re a buy-and-hold investor already with a fully-diversified portfolio of
stocks for long-term growth and bonds and cash for ballast, so you don’t
need a place to ‘hide’. Freedom One MAPs establish you with a diversified
portfolio that rebalances annually, keeping you on an even keel, no matter
which way the (stock) market winds are blowing.
Now, you may have noticed I’ve been
saying “stock (market) correction” instead of “market correction” and that’s
for a very good reason. It’s to remind investors of the other side of the
coin that provides stability to a stock-only portfolio and that is bonds.
History has shown time and time again that a diversified asset allocation
portfolio of stocks and bonds can better weather the effects of a stock
market correction or bear market. In the last economic recession, which
lasted from March ’01 to November ‘01, a portfolio of just stocks mirroring
the S&P 500 Index lost 7.2% of its value. But had the portfolio been
balanced with some bonds and cash, say 60% in stocks, 30% in bonds, and 10%
in cash it would have lost 2% less. Thus, a balanced portfolio would have
benefited from a stable of bond funds, which rose in value as interest rates
fell during the time.
However having said this, bonds won’t
always bolster your portfolio. During the 16-month long recession from
November ’73 to March ’75, it was cash that outshone the three major asset
classes (stock, bonds, and cash). During that recession, which coincided
with the ’73-’74 bear (stock) market, stocks lost nearly 18% of their
value. But 90-Day Treasury Bills, a proxy for cash, generated double-digit
gains; a 60-30-10 portfolio would’ve fallen only 8.4% during that period.
Of course this raises the question: If
one fears a pending economic recession, why not move entirely into bonds and
cash? The answer is there are significant risks associated with trying to
time the market. Because you have to be correct twice – once when you go
out, and a second time when you go back in. Even if an economic recession
is imminent, there’s no guarantee how any asset class will perform during
that brief period. For instance, during the recession from July ’90 to
March ’91, the S&P 500 actually gained 7.6%. But, because of the stellar
performance of bonds, a balanced 60-30-10 portfolio gained even more,
returning 7.7%.
At Freedom One we offer five
risk-based portfolios of diversified stocks and bonds (MAPs) to outperform the
market long-term. They’re retirement portfolios that mitigate undue panic
during a short-term crisis such as we’re currently in. The MAPs
are constructed to weather both the good times and bad times during the long
road to successful retirement. These risk-based portfolios are also
rebalanced each year, and they employ a structured strategy designed to
successfully capture the return of multiple asset classes, while minimizing
stock and bond market risk. Recognize there will be ‘bumps and twists’
along the way, but your path is set, and you’re on the right course.
If you have any questions we invite you
to call your respective Retirement Consultant or Client Relationship
Manager. We thank you for the trust and confidence you have placed in us.
Please know your 401(k) is our own employees' 401(k). We’re in
this together, and long-term, our Freedom One MAPs will serve us well.
|